The Queen of Seaweeds – the story of Amelia Griffiths, an early 19th century pioneer of marine botany.

In 2010, the Royal Society compiled a list of the ten most influential female scientists in British History. One of the ten was Mary Anning (1799-1847) who from humble beginnings in Lyme Regis, Dorset came to be recognised as the “greatest fossil hunter ever known”. Her discoveries of long extinct, fossilised creatures in the cliffs around Lyme Regis were central to the development of new ideas about the history of the earth at the start of the 19th century. She became an expert in her field but did not get the recognition she deserved because science at the time was an exclusively male profession. Nowadays she is receiving this recognition and the fascination of her story has spawned biographies, novels and children’s books. The Lyme Regis Museum has well-developed plans to build an extension, to be called the Mary Anning Wing.

349px-Mary_Anning_painting
Mary Anning

I had thought that Anning was the only prominent West Country female scientist of her time until, walking along the coast path near Torquay recently, I paused to read an information board. This included a panel dedicated to the work of Amelia Griffiths (1768-1858) “who collected and preserved nearly 250 species of seaweed ……. one of the first women to be recognised for their contribution to science.” Never having heard of Griffiths, my interest was piqued, especially when I discovered that, in the 19th century, she was described as “facile Regina – the willingly acknowledged Queen of Algologists”. [Seaweeds are large multicellular marine algae.]

So who was Griffiths and what did she do?

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
Part of the information board that alerted me to Amelia Griffiths

Amelia Warren Rogers was born in Pilton, North Devon in 1768. In 1794 she married Rev. William Griffiths and the couple moved to Cornwall. Eight years later, her husband died suddenly under mysterious circumstances leaving his widow with five young children but not without money. Amelia Griffiths decided to leave Cornwall for Devon, living first at Ottery St Mary before settling in Torquay where she could best follow her favourite pursuit of studying seaweeds.

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERA
One of the Torbay coves that Griffiths may have frequented when she lived in Torquay. Plenty of seaweed is still visible.

For much of her adult life she collected seaweeds avidly: in north Devon and Cornwall, in Dorset and along the East and South Devon coasts. When she began, identification of species was difficult as many had not been named or clearly described so Amelia devised her own names – “bottle brush”, “cobweb” etc. She helped male seaweed enthusiasts in producing scholarly studies on the larger and smaller seaweeds, generously giving her knowledge and donating samples. One such enthusiast was the leading botanist William Henry Harvey with whom she corresponded and who eventually became a close friend. Her reputation grew and in 1817, the Swedish botanist Carl Agardh named a genus of red seaweed Griffithsia in her honour.

seaweed 1 mod 2
Griffithsia setacea from Griffiths’ books. © 2014 Royal Albert Memorial Museum & Art Gallery, Exeter City Council

Dried samples of seaweeds collected by Griffiths are held in several museums including Kew, Torquay and Exeter. Exeter’s Royal Albert Memorial Museum holds three slightly battered leather-bound volumes of her seaweeds which I recently had the privilege to see. Each sample is mounted on stiff white paper and annotated with the name and location in Griffiths’ neat handwriting. Many of the seaweeds still retain their bright colours despite being collected more than a century and a half ago.

seaweed 3 mod 2
Enteromorpha intestinalis. Collected in Torbay. The name suggests that early collectors saw the resemblance with the human intestine. From Griffiths’ books. © 2014 Royal Albert Memorial Museum & Art Gallery, Exeter City Council

Griffiths was often accompanied on her seaweed sorties by Mary Wyatt, formerly a servant in the Griffiths household but eventually the proprietor of a Torquay shop selling shells, polished madrepores and pressed plants. Harvey encouraged Mary Wyatt to sell books of pressed and named seaweeds to help identification. Supervised by Amelia, she produced the first two volumes of Algae Danmonienses (Seaweeds of Devon) by 1833. Each volume contained 50 species and cost 25 shillings or £1 if you subscribed to the series. The books sold well, being partly responsible for making seaweed collecting the must-do pastime at seaside resorts in early Victorian Britain. Followers of this seaweed craze were able to explore nature, improve their scientific knowledge and perhaps produce a memento of their seaside holiday.

book mod 2
The title page of one of Mary Wyatt’s books of seaweeds with a special Royal dedication. © 2014 Royal Albert Memorial Museum & Art Gallery, Exeter City Council.

Despite their extensive correspondence, Harvey and Amelia Griffiths did not meet until 1839 when he visited Torquay. At her urging, he wrote a hand-book of British Marine Algae later expanded to Phycologia Britannica, illustrating all known British Marine Algae. This great work required constant correspondence with Griffiths who despite being in her late 70s provided extensive knowledge of the plants in their natural state. Harvey held her in high regard and his hand-book contained the following dedication: “To Mrs Griffiths of Torquay, Devon, a lady whose long-continued researches have, more than those of any other observer in Britain, contributed to the present advanced state of marine botany….”

The more I investigated the story of Amelia Griffiths, the more I found similarities with Mary Anning. Both were systematic collectors, acquiring immense expertise in their fields and passing on samples to male scientists who furthered their own careers as a result. Both were strong women who pursued their interests whether or not these conformed to norms of society. Griffiths is known to have collected at Lyme Regis so perhaps she encountered Anning on the beach; it is an interesting thought. Anning is now better known, partly because her discoveries were much more significant for science and partly because of the well developed Mary Anning-industry in her home town.

Griffiths lived until nearly 90 maintaining her passion for seaweeds to the end. We must not forget that she began her systematic study of seaweeds in the early years of the 19th century, a time when women could not develop independent scientific careers. Despite this, she made a major contribution to marine botany and deserves to be more widely known.

I should like to thank Holly Morgenroth of the Royal Albert Memorial Museum, Exeter, who showed me Griffiths’ books of seaweeds and took the photographs.

This article first appeared in the August edition of the Dorset-based Marshwood Vale Magazine.

The picture at the top of this post is of Phycodrys rubens (formerly Delesseria sinuosa) in Griffiths’ books (copyright 2014 Royal Albert Memorial Museum and Art Gallery, Exeter City Council).

42 thoughts on “The Queen of Seaweeds – the story of Amelia Griffiths, an early 19th century pioneer of marine botany.”

  1. What I wouldn’t give to be known as the ‘Queen of Algologists’! I wonder how a Fields Medal compares? We women still have quite a few firsts to achieve (no disrespect to Marin Alsop). Sorry, I’m wittering. Great post!

    Like

    1. Thank you, I am pleased you liked it.

      One of the surprising things to me was that Griffiths never published anything herself. This meant her reputation did not last well. I suspect she felt constrained by Victorian gender stereotypes.

      Another seaweed enthusiast who came on the scene about 40 years after Griffiths was Margaret Gatty, also an avid collector. Gatty wrote children’s stories and a lot of popular science including books on seaweeds. She was very well known at the time but this sort of writing kept her within her gender stereotype. She did, however, publish one scientific paper indicating some acceptance by the male science world.

      Things are very different nowadays but there is still important progress to be made for women. I admire Marin Alsop greatly and thought she spoke with great dignity at the Last Night of the Proms. The very fact that she is the only female conductor of a major orchestra shows how much is still to be done.

      Liked by 1 person

    2. Hello Philip I’m a former botanist and ecologist also a historian of botany (PhD in Victorian botany). So I thought I’d comment with my take on women in early 19th century British natural history, drawing on where professional historians of science are at currently on the topic. In short, women did not publish because it was not socially acceptable to do so – on twin levels – men rejected attempts by women to do so and they were excluded from most learned socieities (except the Botanical Society of London- but that was exceptional). Second, women themselves limited their aspirations – it was seen as grossly unattractive to be too intellectual. A woman was always a wife first. She did not wish to cast social disapproval on her husband by being seen to be too immodest. There was a direct link between being clever and being seen as slightly dangerous, immoral and, worse of all, French! Remember the wider socio-politcal context – step out of today’s context where we immediately thnk surely a woman wants recognition – that’s today’s values and we cannot look at the past through them (what historians call the sinnof anachronism!). The French Revolution meant Brtiish elites were paranoid about women and lower classes revolting; coupled with the fear that French atheism would gain hold in Britain. Being a good Christian wife meant you did not stand up in public and speak about your work. That meant you couldn’t give a scientific paper, which meant you didn’t get published as it was an oral culture – in print communications in periodicals were just taking off in the 1830s so intellectual life still generally revolved around conversations at linnean society meetings, British Association for the Advancement of Science
      Meetings from the 1830s and soirees, salons etc. You only got a paper in proceedings of these societies if you spoke formally at one. Women attended in significant numbers – just look at the illustrated London news of pics of BAS meetings- but they had informal conversations that went undocumented. That was often their own choice. Many used pseudonyms in periodical articles, even when therlse were aimed at women. This was a bit more than a gender stereotype. Their ability to take part in natural philosophy (as science was known until c. the 1880s) was constrained by *their own view* of what was morally acceptable for a good Christian woman or wife to be seen to be doing. I suspect its hard today to realise just how powerful morals were in the 19th century at socially constructing how people saw themselves. I hope this helps explain Amelia’s behaviour. I am new to her though (which Christian denomination she was part of is important for example – Quakers and Unitarians like JS Mill were v supportive of women in natural history and natural philosophy) and researching about her – does she have a biography that you have come across?

      Like

      1. Thanks for your comment Clare, it’s very helpful to have this background to the time and to the place of female scientists. I know of no biography of Griffiths, just a few short articles. Ironically, the information board along the coast path that originally alerted me to Griffiths is no longer there so there is no public record of Griffiths apart from the Torquay Museum.

        Like

  2. Fascinating! I never realised how early some people would collect in a scientific manner something that was a passion for them and with very little help. I cannot imagine trying to study anything without the vast body of information that is available to us now. Amelia

    Like

    1. Thanks Amelia. The Victorians were great “categorisers” and for the right person, collecting, describing and labelling was very fulfilling. If you start from scratch, I imagine it can be thrilling to find new species.

      Nowadays, we have all this knowledge and, as you say, this is very useful in helping us identify species or understand other aspects of nature. We must always remember that some of this knowledge could be incorrect or incomplete. For example, I have several books of flowers and I don’t think they agree on their descriptions of some wild species, very confusing for me! Philip

      Like

      1. A good point, we have a lot more help nowadays but we have to be careful not to follow everything blindly just because it in print or on a screen. It is only an assistance it is still up to us to discriminate. When you are starting with identifications of anything it is always so difficult to tell between an important difference and a normal variation.

        Like

  3. What a very good read. Thank you. Both women were obviously very remarkable people, I wonder if they had any idea of the value and worth of their contributions to science, botany and to women’s individualism in general.

    Like

  4. Thanks Emma, I am glad you liked it. I get the impression that Griffiths greatly enjoyed collecting and identifying seaweed and was well aware of her contributions and importance. Because of the position of women at the time, however, she left it to the men to do the writing and theorising. I don’t think she saw this as anything out of the ordinary but it does mean that her own extraordinary role did little to further the cause of women’s individualism.
    Wyatt was basically a businesswoman and needed to make money. The seaweeds were just one part of this and I doubt if she saw it as science; that was what Griffiths did.
    As I mentioned in another comment above the situation began to change with Margaret Gatty. She was very confident of her own ability and contribution and within the confines of Victorian gender stereotypes she pushed the boundaries where she could. I think she did contribute to women’s individualism.

    Like

  5. I really enjoyed your account of Amelia, especially as she is my great-great-great-great-grandmother! Her son William Nelson Griffiths was a fossil dealer. His son John Griffiths was a famous collector and dealer donating many specimens to various museums. He unearthed dinosaur remains on a Folkestone beach. His daughter Elizabeth married Thomas Ingram Ramell a leading light in the Salvation Army and coach builder to royalty. Elizabeth’s daughter Edith was my grandmother and Edith’s sister survived the Titanic en route to America to work for the Salvation Army. Edith’s son Ernest was my father and I have been busy researching my family tree. The information about Amelia was a bonus!

    Like

    1. I also have found this really interesting as my great-great-great grandfather is John Griffiths the fossil collector. I am stuck in researching my family tree in regard to his father William Griffiths. I cannot seem to link this William to William Nelson Griffiths and then Amelia Griffiths. Geoff do you have any of this information?

      Like

      1. Hi Sophie. I don’t know if this helps. As you know, Amelia, my g g g g grandmother married the Rev William Griffiths in 1794. On 1st August 1798, William Nelson Griffiths was born in Walworth, London and later baptised at St Issey in Cornwall on 1st August 1801. In 1802, the Rev William died in St Issey and left £449 to Amelia, “the relict” (not and inconsiderable sum at the time). On 25 May 1819, William Nelson, aged 23, married Ann Conradi in Dover. In Dover in about 1829, John Griffiths was born and on 9th December 1853, aged 24, married Rebecca Jane Kelway in Folkestone. Their daughter, Elizabeth was my great grandmother which makes John Griffiths my g g grandfather so somehow we are related! By the way, in the 1851 census, William Nelson Griffiths is living at 160 Bulwark Lane in Dover with wife, Ann, sons John (your John) and Benjamin, and daughters Elizabeth and Sarah. At the same time, his grandmother, Amelia Griffith (no s) is living in Torquay with two of her daughters, a cook, a housemaid and a footman! It is near Torquay where her plaque is installed.

        Like

      2. Hi Sophie, I am also John Griffiths descendant, his daughter Grace Kelway Griffiths is my great grandmother, same as you I have had problems tracking down William Griffiths despite searching records for the past 35 years. Through which line are you related to John?

        Like

      3. Hi Sophie, I guess that makes us cousins 🙂 I was also born and raised in Folkestone. Have you seen John Griffiths grave? It is set with a huge fossil. I would love to make contact if you are agreeable. Tracy

        Like

      4. Hi Tracy. I’ve never been to John Griffiths’ grave but I have seen a picture. I would love to get in contact. Instead of giving out our personal information here, I have found you on Facebook so I will add you.

        Like

    2. Hi Geoff, I am also John Griffiths great great daughter, (my line is through Grace Kelway Griffiths, my great nanna) I like Sophie have never been able to find Williams parents despite researching for 35 years. Hopefully you can point me in the right direction as unfortunately I have been unable to find any documentary evidence linking him to Amelia. Thanks so much.

      Like

    3. Couldj you please contact Torquay Museum its their 175th anniversary this year 2021 and we are organising a whole pageant dedicated to amelia Griffiths.. would be great to hear from you. xxxxx or contact me sandietippytoes@gmail.com please.

      Like

    4. Hi, I have only just discovered your post about Amelia and the Griffiths! I just have one question about the Ramell sisters, I was wondering if you would be able to tell me which sister it was that survived the Titanic? Its really interesting!

      Like

      1. Hi Danielle. Thomas and Elizabeth Ramell had 5 daughters, Elizabeth, Edith, Beatrice, Florence and Winifred. Edith is my grandmother and Elizabeth and the others my great aunts. Elizabeth was born in Folkestone on May 17, 1882. Elizabeth married Edward Nye on Boxing Day 1904. They lived first at 15 Gladstone Road in Folkestone and then at 4 Myrtle Road. Elizabeth and Edward had a daughter, Masie, who was born on 12th February 1906 and who sadly died nine months later. Both Elizabeth and Edward were members of the Salvation Army and moved to Canada in 1907 and later to America. Then, in 1911 Edward died in New York. Shortly afterwards, Elizabeth, aged 29, returned to Folkestone. In 1912 Evangeline Booth, daughter of general William Booth personally requested that she return to America. In 1912 Elizabeth sailed to America on the Titanic. George Darby, a widower and friend of the Nyes, was there to meet her and they subsequently married in 1913. Elizabeth, as Mrs Colonel George Darby, died in New Jersey in 1963. George, Colonel George Darby died there in 1968.

        Like

      2. Amazing, Thank you Geoff. I have been doing some research into the Griffiths family, and believed that I had made a good match with Amelia and John Griffiths but I have been advised that they are not related. Do you have solid proof that they are? As that would be amazing as it makes perfect sense an would be great to add to my family tree.

        Many thanks!

        Danielle

        Like

  6. Geoff, I apologise for being slow to reply to your fascinating comment. What a tribute to the internet that you found what I wrote. Thank you for adding the details about your family tree. I have never come across anything before about her son and it is very interesting that he was also a collector. Have you ever come across anything about a Catherine Cutler in relation to Amelia Griffiths, Cutler was another seaweed collector at the time but I can find little or no information.

    Like

    1. Sorry, Phillip, I have nothing to add about Catherine Cutler. I am pleased that you were interested to find how I am related to Amelia. Do you know if there any parish records relating to her?

      Like

      1. Sorry, I did not look for parish records so I don’t know. I found it quite difficult to find detailed information about her. I found one short article in the Transactions of the Devonshire Association from the 1950s. Is that of interest?

        Like

  7. Hi all,
    I’m sorry for my late reply. I am related to John Griffiths and Rebecca Jane Kelway through their son William Griffiths (b. 1860) who is my great great grandfather. His son Albert Griffiths (1907-1997) is my great grandfather. And his son is my grandfather Michael Griffiths. We still live in Folkestone, the same area where John lived and worked. At the library/museum they have a photograph of John and Rebecca, newspaper cuttings and a drawing to show where they lived. I am also aware that they have some fossils which they believe to have been found by John (I haven’t had a chance to see these yet). I, like Tracy, have not found any links between William Griffiths and Amelia Griffiths.

    Like

  8. What an amazing story…The women of that time have really left a great scientific legacy. Do you know also of Anna Thynne? ..She too was wife of a clergyman…and she holidayed in Torquay around the 1840s. Her studies on the solitary corals the madrepores did eventually get published. She is attributed by some with developing the first ever marine aquaria…

    Like

    1. Thanks Sandra, they were amazing women. I hadnt heard of Anna Thynne but since you alerted me I have had a look and her story is also fascinating.

      Sorry to be slow to reply to your comment!

      Like

  9. once again, anyone please contact me sandietippytoes@gmail.com the torquay museum are doing a pageant on Amelia Griffiths and it would be absolutely amazing to speak to you all or even invite you to the pageant. many thanks sandy. date 25 march 2021. pageant this summer 2021.

    Like

  10. I came across this blog when researching a remarkable album of pressed seaweeds also collected from sites at Torbay, in the 1880s. The compiler was a young woman, Annie Slade, who was then living with her family in Paignton. She was in her early twenties when she compiled the album as a gift for her friends, Mr and Mrs Slatter.

    The album now resides in the Library of James Cook University in Townsville, north Queensland, Australia, as it is one of many remarkable volumes contained in the extensive personal library of the great British marine biologist, C. M. Yonge (or Sir Maurice Yonge, as he later became known). Yonge’s wonderful collection was gifted to the University library some years ago.

    We cannot know, of course, what influence Amelia Griffiths, or indeed her entrepreneurial assistant Mary Wyatt, might have had on the young Miss Slade; Amelia died before Annie was born. But perhaps she knew about them both and might have seen some of Amelia’s own albums. Annie’s album (dated 1884) also takes a scientific approach in presenting her specimens, and it is remarkable how their vivid colour and delicate structure seem as clear as if they were collected yesterday – not almost 140 years ago. (Incidentally, since Annie Slade (married name, Ainger) also lived until she was 90, it seems seaweed-collecting might have hidden health-giving properties.)

    Last week JCU Library published an eBook about Sir Maurice Yonge’s ground-breaking expedition to the Great Barrier Reef and about his wonderful collection of books covering all aspects of marine life. It was a privilege to contribute Chapter 16 which presents Annie Slade’s album, British Marine Algae, and it may be viewed via this link: https://jcu.pressbooks.pub/yonge/
    At the end of Chapter 16 another link is provided for the fully digitised version of the entire album.

    Thank you to Philip for this excellent blog post, which is properly acknowledged in the eBook, authored by Trisha Fielding.

    Like

    1. Thanks for this fascinating contribution, Liz. I had not heard about Annie Slade but her seaweed book bears an uncanny resemblance to those of Amelia Griffiths. I was luck enough to have a look at one of these held by the Exeter Museum and as you say, the preservation and colours of the seaweeds in the books of Griffiths and Slade are very striking and the samples look almost fresh.
      I dont know if you have seen this: https://paigntonhistory.home.blog/2019/08/01/simla-the-coach-house-on-the-hill/
      The house,Simla, was behind the beach at Goodrington, quite close to where Griffiths used to look I believe.
      Interestingly, my interest in Griffiths was started by an information board on the coast path at Goodrington (pictured in the blog). The board no longer exists so walkers are now unable to read about Griffiths leaving the museums to carry the public record.

      Like

  11. Thanks Philip – sorry not to have replied earlier, I thought I had set things up to receive notification of new comments but evidently not (technology and I don’t always get along too well!). It’s interesting that you found Annie’s album was very similar to the one by Amelia Griffiths which you saw in Exeter. I’m willing to bet young Annie knew about Amelia Griffiths and modelled her album on Amelia’s methods. And yes, I have seen the Paignton history blog and gleaned a fair bit of information about the house, I also sent the author/editor the link to the chapter I wrote about Annie and he was going to bring it up with the local history group. I do think the flourishing of citizen scientists and citizen historians, aided of course by the internet and modern communications, is one of the great positives of the modern world (and right now we certainly need as many positives as we can find, do we not?). Life-long learning – there are no longer any excuses not to pursue that, life-long!
    Thank you also for your wonderful and sensitive writing about so many aspects of the natural world and those who explore it.

    Like

    1. Thanks for your kind words about my writing, Liz, your comments are much appreciated. I agree about the internet and positives of the modern world. It has been very gratifying to see the interest in the Amelia Griffiths post and the number of connections, from all over the world, that this has made. best wishes Philip

      Like

Leave a comment